Advice
Why Most "Difficult Conversations" Training is Absolute Rubbish: What 17 Years of Corporate Reality Actually Taught Me
Our Favourite Reads:
The problem with 89% of difficult conversation training isn't what you think it is.
After seventeen years of watching middle managers squirm through role-plays where they pretend to fire imaginary employees named "Bob," I've come to a startling conclusion. Most difficult conversation training is designed by people who've never actually had to look someone in the eye and tell them their performance is killing team morale. Or that their breath could knock a buzzard off a garbage truck.
But here's the thing nobody wants to admit in polite corporate circles.
The real issue isn't that people don't know HOW to have difficult conversations. It's that they're terrified of the emotional fallout. And no amount of sandwich feedback technique is going to fix that fundamental human truth.
I learnt this the hard way back in 2009 when I was managing a team of twelve in Perth. Sarah, one of my star performers, had developed this habit of interrupting every single meeting with her own agenda items. Brilliant woman, absolutely brilliant, but she was slowly driving the rest of the team mental. Following everything I'd been taught in my shiny corporate training, I scheduled our "development conversation" for 2 PM on a Thursday.
What a disaster.
I'd prepared my talking points. I'd practised my "I" statements. I'd even drawn little diagrams about impact versus intent. Twenty minutes into what should have been a straightforward discussion about meeting etiquette, Sarah was in tears, I was apologising for everything under the sun, and somehow we'd ended up discussing her mother's recent hip replacement surgery.
That's when I realised something crucial about managing difficult conversations - the traditional approach is fundamentally flawed.
The Problem with Pretty Frameworks
Here's what drives me absolutely spare about most training programmes. They treat difficult conversations like some sort of mathematical equation. Input + Process = Desired Outcome. Follow the steps, tick the boxes, job done.
Reality check. People are messy. Emotions are unpredictable. And sometimes the person you're having a "difficult conversation" with is having the worst day of their life for reasons you know nothing about.
I've seen managers stumble through the "SBI" model (Situation, Behaviour, Impact) like they're reading from a teleprompter at a funeral. "Sarah, I wanted to discuss the situation yesterday in the team meeting. Your behaviour of interrupting colleagues has an impact on..."
Mate, you sound like a robot.
The best difficult conversation I ever witnessed happened in a Melbourne cafe in 2015. My colleague James needed to address a performance issue with one of his direct reports. Instead of booking a meeting room and creating all sorts of formal anxiety, he simply asked Tom to grab a coffee.
"Look," James said, stirring his flat white, "I need to talk to you about something that's been bugging me." Then he just... talked. Like a human being. No framework. No prescribed steps. Just honest, direct communication seasoned with genuine care for Tom's success.
Tom appreciated the directness. They sorted it out in fifteen minutes. Problem solved, relationship intact.
Why Most People Avoid Difficult Conversations
Let's be brutally honest about why difficult conversations feel so... difficult. It's not because we lack communication skills. Most of us can communicate perfectly well when we're ordering dinner or explaining why we're late for appointments.
The real culprits are fear and perfectionism.
Fear that we'll say the wrong thing. Fear that the person will cry, get angry, or quit on the spot. Fear that we'll damage a relationship permanently. And underneath it all, this ridiculous perfectionist notion that we should be able to handle every conversation with the grace of a diplomat and the precision of a surgeon.
Here's a controversial opinion that might ruffle some feathers: Sometimes difficult conversations are supposed to be uncomfortable. Sometimes people need to feel a bit awkward about their behaviour. Sometimes a little emotional reaction is exactly what's needed to create genuine change.
I'm not advocating for cruelty or unnecessary harshness. But this modern obsession with making everyone feel comfortable all the time is actually making us worse at addressing problems directly.
The Australian Advantage
You know what I love about working with Australian teams? We generally don't mess about with excessive politeness. Americans will spend forty-five minutes warming up to the actual point of a conversation. Brits will apologise seventeen times before mentioning there might possibly be a tiny issue.
Australians? "Mate, we need to sort this out."
That directness is actually a superpower in difficult conversations, provided you pair it with genuine respect and clear intentions. Some of the most effective difficult conversations I've facilitated have started with variations of "Right, let's cut through the BS and figure this out together."
Of course, you need to read the room. Some situations require more delicacy. But more often than not, people appreciate honesty delivered with good intentions.
What Actually Works in Practice
After years of trial and error (heavy emphasis on error), here's what I've discovered actually moves the needle in difficult conversations:
Preparation matters, but not the way you think. Instead of scripting every word, focus on clarifying your intentions. Why are you having this conversation? What outcome do you genuinely want? If your honest answer is "to vent my frustration," postpone the conversation until you can approach it constructively.
Start with context, not accusations. "I've noticed something that I think is worth discussing" works better than "We need to talk about your attitude problem." The first approach creates curiosity. The second creates defensiveness.
Embrace the awkward silence. When someone receives feedback, they need processing time. Don't rush to fill every pause with additional explanations or apologies. Let them think.
Focus on specific behaviours, not personality traits. "You interrupted Sarah three times in yesterday's meeting" is factual and actionable. "You're always dominating conversations" is subjective and overwhelming.
The irony is that dealing with difficult behaviours becomes significantly easier when you stop treating it like performing surgery and start treating it like... well, like talking to another human being who happens to work with you.
The Uncomfortable Truth About Conflict
Here's something that might shock the peace-at-all-costs brigade: A little bit of healthy conflict is actually good for teams. Not personal attacks or toxic behaviour, but honest disagreement about ideas, processes, and standards.
The teams I've worked with who never have difficult conversations? They're usually underperforming. Not because they lack talent, but because problems fester underneath a veneer of false harmony. Nobody addresses the elephant in the room until it's trampled half the department.
I worked with a Sydney-based marketing team a few years back where everyone was "lovely" and "supportive." Lovely to the point where they spent six months working on a campaign that everyone privately knew was terrible, but nobody wanted to hurt anyone's feelings by saying so. The campaign launched, flopped spectacularly, and suddenly everyone was having very difficult conversations with HR about redundancies.
A single honest conversation in month two could have saved jobs, relationships, and about $200,000 in wasted budget.
What They Don't Teach You in Training
Most training programmes focus on the conversation itself, but ignore the crucial follow-up phase. Here's what actually determines success: what happens in the days and weeks after your difficult conversation.
Did you check in with the person? Did you acknowledge any positive changes? Did you provide the support you promised? Or did you have the conversation, tick the box, and move on to the next item on your to-do list?
The most effective managers I know treat difficult conversations as the beginning of a process, not a one-off event. They follow up consistently, provide resources when needed, and celebrate improvement publicly.
It's not rocket science, but it requires consistent attention and genuine care about people's development.
The Bottom Line
Stop overthinking difficult conversations. Stop waiting for the perfect moment, the perfect words, or the perfect framework. Start caring more about the person's success than your own comfort level.
Most workplace problems aren't actually difficult to discuss - they're just uncomfortable to acknowledge. And sometimes, acknowledging uncomfortable truths is exactly what teams need to move forward.
The best difficult conversation training I ever received? Watching my first boss, Margaret, address issues head-on with kindness, clarity, and absolutely zero tolerance for excuses. She didn't follow a script or use fancy models. She just talked to people like she gave a damn about their success.
That's it. That's the secret.
Now go have that conversation you've been avoiding for three weeks. Your team will thank you for it.
Related Articles: